Serverless vs. traditional servers - which approach do you find offers more scalability and cost-efficiency?

Serverless is really scalable and cost-efficient. It automatically handles traffic spikes by scaling up or down when needed. You only pay for the compute time you use. It is ideal for shifting workloads.

Traditional servers offer greater control and customization. But scaling them requires additional infrastructure and resources. So it can increase costs and complexity. It's like hosting a party where you need to buy a new table every time someone shows up )

For most real-time, dynamic applications, serverless provides unmatched agility and cost savings. Traditional servers may be a better fit for systems with consistent performance and specific configurations.